This blog is a part of the assignment of Paper 201: Indian English Literature – Pre-Independence
Who Pays for Patriotism? Coercive Boycott, Economic Nationalism and the Small Trader in Tagore’s The Home and the World and in India’s ‘Boycott China’ and ‘Vocal for Local’
Table of Content:
Academic Details
Name: Sandhya Bhut
Roll No.: 26
Enrollment No.: 5108250004
Sem.: 3
Batch: 2025 - 2027
E-mail: sandhyabhut06@gmail.com
Assignment Details
Paper Name: Indian English Literature – Pre-Independence
Paper No.: 201
Paper Code: 22406
Unit: 1 – The Home and the World by Rabindranath Tagore
Topic: Who Pays for Patriotism? Coercive Boycott, Economic Nationalism and the Small Trader in Tagore’s The Home and the World and in India’s ‘Boycott China’ and ‘Vocal for Local’ Campaigns (2020–2026)
Submitted To: Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University
Submitted Date: October 19, 2026
The following information—numbers are counted using Quill Bot.
Images:
Words:
Characters:
Characters without spaces:
Paragraphs:
Sentences:
Reading time:
Abstract
Rabindranath Tagore’s The Home and the World turns a quarrel over swadeshi into a question about who bears the cost of patriotism. Nikhil supports the boycott of foreign goods but refuses to force it on a poor trader; Sandip treats coercion as proof of loyalty. This paper reads that dispute through Benedict Anderson’s idea of the imagined community and Ashis Nandy’s account of Tagore’s critique of nationalism, and then tests the reading against India’s post-2020 “Boycott China” calls, the ban on Chinese apps and the “Vocal for Local” campaign. It separates three kinds of pressure, namely social coercion, market campaigns and state policy, and argues that only the first resembles Sandip’s method. It also identifies a paradox: while boycott rhetoric grew, India’s imports from China reached record levels in 2025–26. The paper concludes that Tagore anticipates how patriotic consumption can become a performance of loyalty, paid for most heavily by small traders and ordinary buyers, while structural dependence continues largely unchanged.
Keywords: Tagore; The Home and the World; swadeshi; economic nationalism; boycott; coercion; imagined communities; Ashis Nandy; Vocal for Local; Boycott China
Research Questions
- How does The Home and the World present coercive boycott through the episode of Panchu, and how do Nikhil and Sandip differ on it?
- How does Anderson’s idea of the imagined community explain the way shared acts of consumption or refusal build national feeling?
- How does Nandy’s reading of Tagore illuminate the novel’s ethical critique of nationalism?
- In what ways do the “Boycott China” calls, the app ban and “Vocal for Local” resemble or differ from Sandip’s methods?
- Who bears the cost of patriotic consumption, and what does the gap between public rhetoric and trade data reveal?
Hypothesis
Tagore’s novel suggests that economic nationalism becomes coercive when moral pressure falls on the weakest trader while its leaders bear no cost. Contemporary Indian boycott culture repeats this pattern in part, mainly in its social-media and street forms, while state policy and market campaigns follow a different logic. The gap between public rhetoric and trade reality shows that patriotic consumption often works as a performance of loyalty.
1. Introduction
In the middle of Rabindranath Tagore’s The Home and the World, a poor cloth seller becomes the test of a nation’s love for itself. Panchu sells foreign cloth on the estate of Nikhilesh, a landlord who supports the swadeshi cause but refuses to compel anyone to join it. Sandip, the magnetic nationalist leader who has settled into Nikhil’s house, reads that refusal as weakness. For Sandip the cause cannot wait for consent; Panchu’s shop is a target, and Panchu’s livelihood is a price worth paying. Almost every important question the novel asks about nationalism can be seen in this small episode: who decides what patriotism requires, who is made to pay for it, and what happens to moral choice when loyalty is demanded by a crowd.
More than a century later, the same questions return in India’s markets and on its phones. In May 2020 the prime minister urged citizens to be “vocal for local” (Prime Minister’s Office). A month later, after a deadly clash between Indian and Chinese soldiers in the Galwan Valley, calls to boycott Chinese goods spread through social media and trade bodies (Associated Press), and the government blocked dozens of mostly Chinese apps (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology). Yet by 2025–26 India’s imports from China had reached record levels (“New Delhi’s Strategy”), and the state had begun to ease some restrictions on Chinese investment (“India’s Investment Reforms”). Loudly declared loyalty and quietly deepening dependence were moving in opposite directions.
This paper reads the two moments together. It argues that Tagore anticipates the way patriotic consumption can turn moral pressure on ordinary people into a performance of loyalty, and that the cost of that performance falls most heavily on the small trader and the individual buyer. The argument rests on two lenses: Benedict Anderson’s idea of the nation as an imagined community, and Ashis Nandy’s reading of Tagore’s critique of nationalism. The paper reviews the scholarship, sets out the theory and the historical background of swadeshi, reads the Panchu episode and the characters of Sandip, Nikhil and Bimla closely, and then examines two contemporary cases before considering a counter-argument.
2. Literature Review
Scholarship on The Home and the World has long treated the novel as Tagore’s most direct fictional engagement with nationalism. Ashis Nandy’s The Illegitimacy of Nationalism is the most influential such reading. Nandy argues that Tagore regarded the nation-state as an imported ideology that threatened the ethical and cultural life of ordinary people, and he reads Sandip and Nikhil as two answers to that threat: one surrenders to it, the other resists it (Nandy [page]). Tagore’s own lectures in Nationalism supply the argument behind the fiction, warning that the nation organises a people for power and treats human beings as means rather than ends (Tagore, Nationalis).
Historians of the Swadeshi movement supply the context. Sumit Sarkar’s study of Bengal between 1903 and 1908 documents how boycott depended on volunteers and social pressure, and how it strained relations between the movement’s educated leaders and the poorer traders and peasants who were asked to give up cheap foreign goods (Sarkar). Bindu Puri’s study of the Tagore–Gandhi debate, which covers the boycott and burning of foreign cloth, shows how central boycott was to Tagore’s disagreement with the nationalist movement (Puri). Benedict Anderson’s Imagined Communities offers the wider framework: nations exist because people imagine themselves bound to strangers through shared practices (Anderson).
What remains less explored is the link between the novel’s boycott episode and consumer nationalism today. Studies of India’s post-2020 policy towards China appear mostly in economics, international relations and policy journals, and literary scholars have rarely connected them to Tagore. [Add two or three recent journal articles on consumer nationalism or the post-2020 boycott here, each with an MLA citation and a sentence on what it adds.] This paper begins to close that gap by treating Tagore’s novel as a way of asking who pays when a nation asks its people to prove their loyalty through what they buy.
3. Theoretical Framework
3.1 Anderson: Boycott as the Ritual of an Imagined Community
Anderson defines the nation as an imagined political community, imagined because most of its members will never meet, yet each carries in mind an image of their communion (Anderson). Such an image must be kept alive through shared practices. Boycott is one of them. What a person buys, wears or refuses becomes visible evidence of belonging, which is why Sandip’s campaign cannot treat the purchase of cloth as a private matter. Consumption becomes a public ritual, and refusal becomes a sign of betrayal.
Anderson stresses that the nation is conceived as a “deep, horizontal comradeship” (Anderson). The difficulty this paper explores is that such comradeship can coexist with very unequal costs. When the ritual of boycott is performed, someone must absorb the loss, and it is rarely the person who leads the chanting.
3.2 Nandy: The Ethical Critique of Nationalism
Nandy’s reading supplies the second question. For him, Tagore’s objection is not to love of country but to the idea that the country can justify any act committed in its name (Nandy). The novel therefore tests nationalism by its means. Sandip’s means are slogans, pressure and money; Nikhil’s are patience and consent. In this paper Anderson’s lens asks how boycott builds the community, while Nandy’s asks what the community is allowed to do to its own members.
4. Historical Context: Swadeshi, Boycott and Coercion
4.1 Bengal, 1905 and After
The novel is set against the Swadeshi agitation that followed the partition of Bengal in 1905 (Sarkar). The boycott of British goods began as a creative political tool and a spur to local industry, and Tagore took an active part in its early phase. As the movement hardened, however, volunteers increasingly used social pressure and intimidation against those who would not comply, and Tagore withdrew from it (Sarkar; Nandy). The novel grows out of that disillusion, and Sarkar’s history helps readers see that Sandip’s methods were not invented for fiction (Sarkar).
4.2 Gandhi and Tagore, 1921
The debate returned in 1921 when Gandhi led public bonfires of foreign cloth during the Non-Cooperation movement (Puri). Tagore criticised the campaign in his essay “The Call of Truth,” questioning the destruction of cloth and the demand for obedience in place of thought (Bhattacharya), and Gandhi replied in “The Great Sentinel” in Young India on 13 October 1921 (Bhattacharya). The exchange matters here because it shows that Tagore’s unease in the novel was a settled position, not a passing mood. His objection was to the method and its moral cost, not to the aim of economic self-reliance.
5. Close Reading: Sandip, Nikhil and Bimla
5.1 Sandip’s Rhetoric of Loyalty
Sandip’s power lies first in speech. He turns the slogan Bande Mataram into a test of loyalty, flatters Bimla as the living spirit of the nation, and treats persuasion and pressure as a single continuous method. In his own narrative he is unembarrassed about means; he argues that the great cause lifts its servants above ordinary scruples (Tagore, The Home and the World). The same logic leads him to collect funds in the cause’s name and to persuade Bimla to take a large sum from her husband’s treasury. Patriotism, for Sandip, is a language that makes every demand sound noble.
This is also why his campaign reaches the market. Once loyalty is measured by what people sell and buy, the shopkeeper becomes a public figure whether he wishes it or not. Anderson’s ritual of belonging turns into a means of surveillance, and the people with the least power are watched most closely.
5.2 Nikhil and Panchu: The Limit of the Cause
Nikhil’s position is often misread as indifference. He sympathises with swadeshi and wants his country to flourish. What he refuses is compulsion. Panchu’s case sharpens the point: he is not an enemy of the nation but a poor man who sells what his customers can afford. To drive him out of his trade is to make him pay, with his livelihood, for a loyalty he was never asked to give freely. Nikhil’s principle is stated in his own words, when he says that to “worship my country as a god is to bring a curse upon it” (Tagore, The Home and the World).
The refusal has a parallel in his marriage. Nikhil wants Bimla to choose him freely rather than by habit or duty, and he refuses to build any bond on compulsion, in the home or in the world. The two refusals belong together. In both, he accepts the risk of losing rather than win by force, and in both he is punished for it. For Nandy, this is exactly the ethical stance that Tagore sets against the nationalist: a patriotism that can bear the weight of other people’s freedom (Nandy).
5.3 Bimla and the Cost the Cause Conceals
Bimla begins as an admirer of Sandip’s fire. Because Tagore gives the story to three narrators, the reader can watch her admiration meet its consequences. As the movement’s demands widen into theft, deceit and violence, her own narrative exposes a growing distance between the cause’s language and its effects: slogans on one side, frightened villagers and ruined livelihoods on the other. Her recognition arrives late and at great cost, but it gives the novel its moral weight. The one who was first dazzled by nationalism is the one who sees what it has cost.
6. Case Study One: The Galwan Moment and the Politics of the Boycott Call
6.1 From Border Clash to Consumer Pledge
On 15 June 2020 a clash with Chinese troops in the Galwan Valley left twenty Indian soldiers dead, the deadliest confrontation between the two sides in 45 years (Associated Press). Within days, calls to boycott Chinese goods were circulating through social media. The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) called for a boycott of 500 Chinese products, including toys and textiles (Associated Press), later set a target of cutting imports from China by ₹1,00,000 crore by December 2021 (Banerji), and asked film and sports celebrities to stop endorsing Chinese phone brands (“CAIT Requests”). Traders burned Chinese goods in a Delhi market (“India, China Commanders”), and a video of men in Coimbatore smashing their smartphones went viral (Banerji). A Delhi hotel association announced that its members would bar Chinese guests (“Delhi Hotel Association”).
Anderson’s lens explains the speed: grief and anger needed a shared practice, and refusing to buy offered one that anyone could join. Nikhil’s question explains the weakness. A television that has already been bought and then smashed is a loss to its owner, not to China. A shop that holds stock bought months earlier is a loss to the shopkeeper. The ritual displayed loyalty, but the cost fell on the buyer and the small retailer. Contemporary reporting itself described the ban on Chinese hotel guests as largely symbolic (“Delhi Hotel Association”). This is Panchu’s position in a modern market.
6.2 The App Ban: State Action, Not Street Pressure
On 29 June 2020 the government blocked fifty-nine mobile apps, most of them Chinese and including TikTok, under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, citing sovereignty, security and the misuse of user data (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology). This was state policy under law, not mob pressure, and it should not be equated with Sandip’s methods. It nevertheless shows how the symbolic and the material merge. The press release did not name China, according to an analysis by the Software Freedom Law Centre (Software Freedom Law Centre), so the ban was framed as a security measure even though most of the apps were Chinese. The distinction matters for the argument. Only the social and street forms of boycott resemble Sandip’s coercion; the ban belongs to the state’s security logic.
7. Case Study Two: “Vocal for Local” and the Trade Paradox
7.1 Patriotism as a Purchasing Choice
In his address of 12 May 2020, announcing the Atmanirbhar Bharat package of ₹20 lakh crore, the prime minister said the pandemic had shown the importance of local manufacturing, local markets and local supply chains, and urged citizens to be “vocal for local” (Prime Minister’s Office). The slogan predates Galwan and was not framed as a boycott of any country, but it supplied the moral vocabulary within which the later calls to boycott Chinese goods were heard. The phrase framed buying choices as a form of duty. Unlike the boycott of Chinese goods, it is persuasion rather than coercion. Even so, it places the moral burden on the ordinary buyer, who is asked to pay for patriotism at the till, while manufacturers continue to depend on imported components and inputs [cite a source on India’s dependence on Chinese components].
7.2 The Paradox of the Numbers
The trade figures complicate the rhetoric. Reports on India’s trade in the financial year 2025–26 place imports from China at roughly $131.6 billion, the highest India has recorded from any single country, within total bilateral goods trade of about $151 billion (“New Delhi’s Strategy”). Imports from China kept growing in the first quarter of FY27, by 28 percent according to one report (“India’s Imports from China”). The pattern is not new: in 2021 a business magazine noted that, despite the backlash against Chinese goods, China remained India’s biggest trade partner (Banerji). Since late 2024 India and China have also moved towards gradual normalisation, and in 2026 India partially eased restrictions on investment from land-border countries (“India’s Investment Reforms”; “Easing India’s Curbs”). The state’s policy has become more pragmatic while the public language of boycott remains loud.
The gap is the paper’s central evidence. Where rhetoric and structure diverge, the visible act of loyalty becomes performance, and performance is paid for by those least able to opt out.
7.3 Who Pays?
Placed beside Panchu, the contemporary cases reveal a pattern. The small retailer who holds Chinese stock, the buyer who pays more for a local substitute, and the worker in a small firm that relies on imported parts all carry costs that no one announces. The large firm with bargaining power and the policymaker who adjusts course quietly do not. Tagore’s question, who pays for patriotism, remains the right one.
8. Counter-Argument: Boycott as Legitimate Economic Self-Defence
A strong objection is that boycott is a legitimate instrument. States and citizens have long used it to protect industry or to protest injustice, and Gandhi defended it as a moral discipline. Nikhil himself supports swadeshi. The paper does not dispute this. Its claim is narrower: the objection in Tagore’s novel is to coercion and to the shifting of cost onto the powerless. A voluntary, informed choice to buy local, backed by support for those who bear the transition, is not Sandip’s method. It is also unfair to equate any government with Sandip. The analysis here separates social coercion, market campaigns and state policy precisely so that each is judged by its own means and consequences.
9. Conclusion
Tagore’s The Home and the World shows that economic nationalism becomes dangerous at the point where moral pressure replaces consent and the weakest person pays. In Panchu’s case the stakes are one man’s livelihood; in Nikhil’s refusal the stake is the principle that a cause should not be advanced by compelling people. Anderson helps explain why boycott is such a powerful ritual of belonging, and Nandy helps explain why Tagore distrusted it.
India’s post-2020 experience confirms part of this pattern. The social and street forms of the “Boycott China” moment echo Sandip’s logic of loyalty by display, while the app ban and the “Vocal for Local” campaign follow different logics of state security and persuasion. The distance between boycott rhetoric and record import figures suggests that patriotic consumption often functions as a performance of loyalty, whose costs fall on small traders and ordinary buyers. Tagore’s lesson is not that a nation should not care for its own industry. It is that a nation’s love must be tested by what it asks of the people with the least power to refuse.
References:
Ahmad, Dohra. “The Home, the World and the United States: Young India's Tagore.” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, vol. 43, no. 1, Mar. 2008, pp. 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989407087823.
Bhagat-Kennedy, Monika. “‘The True India Is an Idea’: Beyond Rabindranath Tagore’s Prescience on Nationalism.” LIT: Literature Interpretation Theory, vol. 36, no. 2, 2025, pp. 154–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2025.2516396.
Embassy of India, Beijing. “Trade and Economic Relations.” Embassy of India, Beijing. https://www.eoibeijing.gov.in/page/trade-and-economic-relations/. Accessed 19 Oct. 2026.
Jelnikar, Ana. “Hospitality and Worldliness: Tagore’s Household Drama of Love and Responsibility.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, vol. 39, no. 2, 2016, pp. 350–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2016.1156512.
Kaviraj, Sudipta. “Book Reviews and Notices: Ashis Nandy: The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1983. 121 pp. Rs 65.” Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 18, no. 1, May 1984, pp. 136–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/006996678401800111.
Motilal, Shashi, editor. Applied Ethics and Human Rights: Conceptual Analysis and Contextual Applications. Anthem Press, 2010. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1gsmxx5. Accessed 17 Oct. 2026.
Quayum, Mohammad A. “Rabindranath Tagore: A Sectarian or a Cosmopolitan Writer?” Asian Studies Review, vol. 49, no. 2, 2025, pp. 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2024.2389830.
Ray, Sangeeta. En-Gendering India: Woman and Nation in Colonial and Postcolonial Narratives. Duke University Press, 2000. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1168b7g. Accessed 17 Oct. 2026.
Sarkar, Sumit. The Swadeshi Movement in Bengal, 1903–1908. People's Publishing House, 1973. https://tehattagovtcollege.ac.in/Pdf/Resources/History/Online-learning/PDF-Book/INDIAN%20HISTORY%20MODERN%20TIME/Sumit_sarkar_the_swadeshi_movement_in_bengal_1903.pdf.
Tagore, Rabindranath. Nationalism. Macmillan, 1917. Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/nationalismrabindranathtagore1917_11_A.
Union Cabinet. “Cabinet Approves Changes in Guidelines on Investments from Countries Sharing Land Border with India.” Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 10 Mar. 2026, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2237806&lang=2®=48.
No comments:
Post a Comment