Academic Details
- Name: Sandhya Bhut
- Roll No.: 27
- Enrollment No.: 5108250004
- Sem.: 1
- Batch: 2025 - 2026
- E-mail: sandhyabhut06@gmail.com
Assignment Details
- Paper Name: History of English Literature – From 1350 to 1900
- Paper No.: 105A
- Paper Code: 22396
- Unit: 1 - Chaucer to Renaissance
- Topic: Comedy as a Mirror of Society: Social Satire in Shakespeare and Ben Jonson
- Submitted To: Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University
- Submitted Date: November 10, 2025
The following information—numbers are counted using QuillBot.
- Images: 5
- Words: 3101
- Characters: 20390
- Characters without spaces: 17039
- Paragraphs: 88
- Sentences: 255
- Reading time: 12m 24s
Table of Contents
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
The Role of Comedy in Society
The Elizabethan Theatre as a Social Mirror
Shakespeare’s Romantic Comedy: Laughter and Harmony
As You Like It: Nature, Disguise, and Human Freedom
Ben Jonson’s City Comedy: Satire and Moral Exposure
The Alchemist: The London World of Deception
Bartholomew Fair: Society in Carnival Form
Shakespeare and Jonson Compared: Two Faces of Comic Vision
Social Themes: Class, Gender, and Morality on the Stage
The Humanist Spirit in Comic Art
The Continuing Legacy of Shakespeare and Jonson
Conclusion
References
1. Abstract
Comedy has always been more than entertainment. It is a mirror that reflects society’s manners, flaws, and moral contradictions with laughter and insight. In the Elizabethan era a period of intellectual awakening, political expansion, and social change comedy became a powerful cultural form that expressed the tensions of a society in transition. Among the many dramatists of that time, William Shakespeare and Ben Jonson stand out as two masters who transformed comedy into a vehicle of moral and social reflection. Shakespeare’s comedies, filled with wit, disguise, and romance, offer a world where laughter reconciles conflicts and restores harmony. Jonson’s comedies, in contrast, are sharp satires that expose the greed, hypocrisy, and folly of urban life.
This essay explores how both playwrights used comedy as a mirror of Elizabethan society one through forgiveness and renewal, the other through correction and exposure. By examining As You Like It, The Alchemist, and Bartholomew Fair, it argues that Shakespeare and Jonson, despite their differences, shared a humanist vision: they believed that to laugh at human folly is to understand it. Their art reveals that comedy, far from being trivial, is a moral force a reflection of life that teaches through delight.
2. Keywords
Elizabethan Comedy, Shakespearean Wit, Ben Jonson, Social Satire, Romantic and Pastoral Comedy, City Comedy, Renaissance Humanism, Character-driven Humor, Urban Life and Morality, Gender and Class in Drama, Disguise and Identity, Love and Reconciliation, Greed and Folly, As You Like It, The Alchemist, Bartholomew Fair
3. Introduction
The Elizabethan period marks one of the richest moments in the history of English drama. It was an age of discovery, prosperity, and contradiction. England, under Queen Elizabeth I, was rapidly becoming a world power. The growth of cities, the expansion of trade, and the spread of education created a society full of energy but also moral uncertainty. The theatre became the meeting place of this restless world. It reflected its joys, its ambitions, and its vices.
In this setting, William Shakespeare and Ben Jonson rose as two contrasting yet complementary voices. Both were products of the same theatrical culture, yet their visions of comedy could not be more different. Shakespeare, with his romantic imagination, believed in laughter as a path to understanding and harmony. Jonson, a scholar of classical tradition, used laughter as a tool of discipline and reform.
Yet both shared a central purpose: to hold a mirror up to life. Their plays do not simply make audiences laugh they make them think. Through humour, irony, and wit, both dramatists reveal the values, hypocrisies, and moral dilemmas of their society. Comedy becomes, in their hands, a serious art a way of understanding what it means to be human.
4. The Role of Comedy in Society
Comedy has always performed a double task: to entertain and to instruct. Ancient philosophers like Aristotle and Horace saw comedy as a form of moral correction. By laughing at folly, audiences were encouraged to recognize and avoid it. Renaissance humanists revived this classical idea, believing that laughter could enlighten as well as amuse.
In the Elizabethan world, this belief found a natural stage. The theatre brought together all classes nobles, merchants, and apprentices in a shared public experience. The comic stage allowed society to see itself exaggerated but recognizable. People could laugh at their rulers, their neighbours, and even themselves, all within the safe space of performance.
Thus, comedy became a social mirror. It reflected vanity, ambition, love, greed, and foolishness in all their forms. But it also revealed the possibility of change. Laughter, in the Renaissance imagination, was not cruel mockery; it was a sign of awareness, the first step toward wisdom.
5. The Elizabethan Theatre as a Social Mirror
The Elizabethan stage was a microcosm of the entire nation. The Globe Theatre, the Fortune, and other playhouses attracted audiences from every walk of life. In a single afternoon, a nobleman could stand beside an apprentice, both laughing at the same fool’s jest. This mingling of social classes gave the theatre a uniquely democratic energy.
Playwrights responded to this diverse audience by writing comedies that spoke to everyone. The noble could recognize the satire of ambition; the commoner could enjoy the jokes about masters and servants. The stage became both a reflection and a critique of Elizabethan life.
Within this shared space, Shakespeare and Jonson developed two distinctive forms of comedy. Shakespeare’s romantic comedies offered a dream of unity and renewal, where conflicts of love and society were resolved in joy. Jonson’s city comedies, rooted in realism and moral observation, turned the stage into a laboratory of human vice. Together, they captured the full spectrum of their society from courtly ideals to urban corruption.
6. Shakespeare’s Romantic Comedy: Laughter and Harmony
Shakespeare’s comedies are marked by transformation and reconciliation. They begin with disorder confusion of identity, broken relationships, or social tension and end in harmony, often through love and forgiveness. This pattern reflects Shakespeare’s faith in the redemptive power of laughter.
Unlike the harsh laughter of satire, Shakespeare’s humour is generous and humane. He laughs with humanity, not at it. His characters are flawed but lovable; their mistakes arise from passion or ignorance, not malice. His clowns, fools, and lovers all teach the same lesson: that life’s confusions can be healed through understanding.
In As You Like It, this comic spirit reaches one of its highest expressions. The play offers a complete contrast between two worlds the rigid, ambitious court and the free, imaginative forest. Through disguise, wit, and role-playing, Shakespeare explores how laughter leads to self-knowledge.
7. As You Like It: Nature, Disguise, and Human Freedom
As You Like It opens with conflict brothers at odds, lovers separated, and a corrupt duke ruling unjustly. But when the characters flee to the Forest of Arden, they enter a world of play and transformation. Here, the strict rules of the court are replaced by the laws of nature and the heart.
Rosalind, the play’s central figure, embodies Shakespeare’s belief in laughter as freedom. Disguised as the young man Ganymede, she gains the power to speak and act beyond social limits. Her wit exposes the foolishness of romantic convention and reveals the equality between men and women. Through humour, she educates Orlando, tests love’s sincerity, and restores moral balance.
The forest is not a mere escape it is a moral mirror. Each character, from the melancholy Jaques to the clown Touchstone, reflects a different attitude toward life. Jaques sees only vanity in human behaviour; Touchstone mocks everyone but himself; Rosalind sees through both and brings wisdom through laughter.
In the end, the comic vision triumphs. The exiled are restored, lovers united, and the duke reconciled. The multiple marriages at the conclusion symbolize social harmony. Shakespeare suggests that laughter and forgiveness can heal even the deepest divisions of society. His comedy, though playful, carries a profound faith in humanity’s capacity for renewal.
8. Ben Jonson’s City Comedy: Satire and Moral Exposure
Ben Jonson represents the other great tradition of Elizabethan comedy the satirical and moralistic. A learned writer steeped in classical models, Jonson believed that the purpose of art was to teach as well as delight. His laughter is not gentle but sharp; it exposes folly and demands reform.
Jonson’s comedies are set not in forests or courts but in the bustling streets of London. His characters are merchants, alchemists, zealots, and fools all driven by obsession or greed. He called this method the “comedy of humours,” meaning that each character is ruled by a single dominant trait or “humour.” The miser is consumed by avarice, the hypocrite by self-righteousness, the gull by vanity.
Through this structure, Jonson created a vivid social portrait of urban life. His London is energetic but corrupt a world where everyone deceives or is deceived. Laughter, for Jonson, becomes an act of exposure, burning away illusion to reveal moral truth.
9. The Alchemist: The London World of Deception
In The Alchemist, Jonson presents London as a city of endless trickery. Three con artists Face, Subtle, and Dol Common use their wit to exploit the greed and gullibility of others. Their victims come from every class: the nobleman who dreams of riches, the puritan who seeks divine power, the tradesman who wants quick success. Each is blinded by desire.
The alchemical furnace at the heart of the play becomes a symbol of human ambition. It promises transformation but delivers only ruin. The entire city seems caught in a fever of greed. Yet Jonson’s satire is not simply cruel it is moral. He mocks to purify, not to destroy. The laughter that fills The Alchemist carries the sting of conscience.
When the tricks collapse, order is restored, not by magic but by reason. Jonson closes the play with exposure and repentance. His laughter aims to cleanse the audience’s understanding, reminding them that folly begins with self-deception. The play’s comic energy, therefore, hides a deep moral seriousness: that society, corrupted by greed, must rediscover integrity through awareness.
10. Bartholomew Fair: Society in Carnival Form
Bartholomew Fair expands Jonson’s satire into a grand social panorama. The London fairground becomes a miniature world a noisy, colourful, and chaotic carnival where every kind of person gathers. Traders cheat customers, Puritans preach against sin while secretly indulging in it, and fools parade their vanity for all to see.
Jonson uses this setting to portray the moral confusion of modern society. The fair is a place of equality, but also of corruption. It erases social boundaries, mixing nobles with beggars, preachers with thieves. Everyone becomes part of the same comic spectacle.
Yet within this disorder lies Jonson’s human insight. Though he ridicules vice, he also recognizes vitality. His laughter, however stern, acknowledges that folly is universal. The fair’s noise and variety symbolize the restless spirit of humanity itself flawed, foolish, yet endlessly alive.
Through Bartholomew Fair, Jonson turned the theatre into a civic mirror, showing London to itself. The audience, seeing their world exaggerated on stage, could not help but recognize their own vanities. In this sense, Jonson’s satire performs the same social function as Shakespeare’s romance it reveals truth through laughter.
11. Shakespeare and Jonson Compared: Two Faces of Comic Vision
Shakespeare and Ben Jonson are two of the greatest comic writers of the English Renaissance, but their ways of making people laugh are very different. Both used comedy to show truths about human behaviour and society, but their styles and purposes are not the same. Shakespeare’s comedy is warm, forgiving, and full of imagination, while Jonson’s is sharp, serious, and focused on teaching a lesson. One touches the heart, the other tests the mind.
In Shakespeare’s plays, humour comes from people and situations, not from fixed types. Characters like Touchstone in As You Like It or Feste in Twelfth Night are clever fools who speak the truth with kindness. They make audiences laugh, but their jokes also make people think. Shakespeare’s stories often start with confusion or conflict but end in understanding and happiness. Places like the forest of Arden or the magical Athens of A Midsummer Night’s Dream give characters the freedom to discover themselves, solve problems, and forgive each other. Laughter in Shakespeare’s plays is gentle it heals rather than punishes.
Jonson, on the other hand, focuses on the city and real-life problems. In plays like Volpone and The Alchemist, his characters represent one main flaw greed, vanity, or hypocrisy and they cannot change. Jonson’s humour exposes people’s faults and warns the audience about them. His laughter is serious; it teaches a lesson. His city comedies show the tricks and mistakes of people living in a busy, competitive world. Unlike Shakespeare, Jonson does not end his plays with harmony or love. His goal is to correct bad behaviour and show the consequences of selfishness.
Even though Shakespeare and Jonson are different, they share the same basic idea: comedy should reflect society. Shakespeare believes people can improve through love and understanding. Jonson believes people must be corrected through reason and discipline. Shakespeare’s plays feel like poetry imaginative and forgiving. Jonson’s feel like a lesson structured and clear. Together, their work shows both sides of the Elizabethan world: the hopeful and idealistic, and the realistic and cautious.
In short, Shakespeare makes us laugh with people, while Jonson makes us laugh at people. Both kinds of laughter reveal truths about human nature. Together, they give a complete picture of Elizabethan society and show why comedy is more than entertainment it is a mirror of life.
12. Social Themes: Class, Gender, and Morality on the Stage
Both writers used comedy to explore the social tensions of Elizabethan life. Class, gender, and morality were central concerns of their time, and the stage became a place where these could be questioned.
In Shakespeare’s plays, disguise often allows characters to cross social and gender boundaries. Rosalind’s male attire gives her freedom of speech and action denied to women in society. Through wit, she proves herself equal or even superior to men. Shakespeare’s laughter thus becomes a quiet challenge to patriarchal and class hierarchies.
Jonson’s world, by contrast, exposes the corruption within those hierarchies. His merchants, scholars, and preachers all reveal the same moral weakness: hypocrisy. In The Alchemist and Bartholomew Fair, the pursuit of wealth or reputation replaces genuine virtue. Jonson warns that when society measures worth by status or money, it loses its moral compass.
Both writers democratize laughter. On their stages, kings and clowns alike become subjects of humour. The audience, too, is invited to laugh not only at others but at themselves. In this way, comedy becomes a subtle form of moral education a lesson in humility and recognition.
13. The Humanist Spirit in Comic Art
The unifying thread in both Shakespeare’s and Jonson’s work is humanism, the Renaissance faith in reason, virtue, and human dignity. Both writers, despite their differences, believe that laughter has the power to elevate as well as to expose.
For Shakespeare, laughter affirms life’s resilience. It teaches that error and forgiveness are natural parts of being human. His comedies suggest that society can heal itself through empathy and imagination. For Jonson, laughter disciplines the mind. It strips away illusion and reminds people of the need for moral clarity.
In both, we find the humanist conviction that art should improve life by revealing truth. Comedy, far from being light entertainment, becomes a serious moral dialogue between playwright and audience, heart and intellect, art and reality.
14. The Continuing Legacy of Shakespeare and Jonson
The influence of Shakespeare and Ben Jonson goes far beyond their own time. Shakespeare’s romantic comedies, full of wit, love, and imagination, inspired later writers like Congreve, Sheridan, and Oscar Wilde. These writers borrowed his skill of blending humour with understanding, showing that laughter can teach while it entertains. Jonson’s sharp, realistic comedies, on the other hand, shaped the Restoration theatre and even modern realist drama. Playwrights like Molière and George Bernard Shaw followed his example, using satire to reveal human greed, pride, and folly.
Even today, their plays continue to speak to audiences around the world. In our busy, competitive, and often self-interested society, we can still see ourselves in their characters the dreamers, the schemers, the fools, and the wise. The situations Shakespeare created, where mistakes are forgiven and love restores order, still give hope and joy. Jonson’s world, full of moral lessons and clever exposure of human faults, still teaches us caution and self-awareness. Their laughter is not just entertainment it is a mirror reflecting who we are.
The real power of Shakespeare and Jonson lies in balance. Shakespeare shows us the importance of kindness, forgiveness, and empathy. Jonson reminds us of the need for honesty, responsibility, and moral judgement. Together, they present a full picture of human nature. They show that to be human is to make mistakes, to face challenges, to laugh at ourselves, and to grow. The theatre they created was never just a place for escape; it was a place for understanding life. Their legacy proves that comedy is timeless: it entertains, it teaches, and it helps us see the truth about ourselves. Even centuries later, their work continues to inspire, reminding us that laughter is one of the most powerful ways to understand the human heart.
15. Conclusion
Comedy, in the hands of Shakespeare and Ben Jonson, became a mirror of society and a measure of humanity. Both men transformed laughter into insight, revealing the weaknesses and possibilities of their age.
Shakespeare’s As You Like It imagines a world healed by love and laughter, where forgiveness restores order. Jonson’s The Alchemist and Bartholomew Fair expose the restless corruption of urban life, demanding reform through ridicule. One redeems, the other corrects but both illuminate truth.
Their comedies reflect the two great needs of civilization: sympathy and discipline. We need Shakespeare’s laughter to forgive, and Jonson’s to awaken. Together they remind us that to laugh is not to escape reality, but to confront it honestly.
Even centuries later, their art speaks with clarity. Society still finds itself in their mirror vain, hopeful, foolish, and wise. Through their laughter, we see not only the world of Elizabethan England, but the enduring image of ourselves.
16. References :
---. As You Like It. Project Gutenberg, 2023, www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1523/pg1523-images.html.
Denvir, John. “William Shakespeare and the Jurisprudence of Comedy.” Stanford Law Review, vol. 39, no. 4, 1987, pp. 825–49. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1228870. Accessed 7 Nov. 2025.
Danson, Lawrence. “Jonsonian Comedy and the Discovery of the Social Self.” PMLA, vol. 99, no. 2, 1984, pp. 179–93. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/462160. Accessed 7 Nov. 2025.
Hubler, Edward. “The Range of Shakespeare’s Comedy.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 2, 1964, pp. 55–66. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2867876. Accessed 7 Nov. 2025.
Hays, H. R. “Satire and Identification: An Introduction to Ben Jonson.” The Kenyon Review, vol. 19, no. 2, 1957, pp. 267–83. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4333755. Accessed 7 Nov. 2025.
Hume, Robert D. “The Socio-Politics of London Comedy from Jonson to Steele.” Huntington Library Quarterly, vol. 74, no. 2, 2011, pp. 187–217. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.1525/hlq.2011.74.2.187. Accessed 7 Nov. 2025.
Jonson, Ben. Bartholomew Fair: A Comedy. Project Gutenberg, 2015, www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/49461/pg49461-images.html.
KERINS, FRANK. “The Crafty Enchaunter: Ironic Satires and Jonson’s ‘Every Man Out of His Humour.’” Renaissance Drama, vol. 14, 1983, pp. 125–50. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41917204. Accessed 7 Nov. 2025.
.png)
